Ifeanyichukwu Ogobuiro, MD, MHS
T32 Surgical Oncology Research Fellow
University of Miami School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center
Miami, Florida, United States
Disclosure: I do not have any relevant financial / non-financial relationships with any proprietary interests.
Young-onset pancreatic cancer (YOPC; < 50 yrs) has been associated with male preponderance, extensive smoking history, and a trend towards improved survival compared with average-onset pancreatic cancer (AOPC; ≥70 yrs). Using a large matched genomic-transcriptomic next-generation sequencing (NGS) dataset, we sought to characterize the molecular landscape underlying these clinical differences between YOPC and AOPC patients.
Methods: A total of 2430 NGS samples (YOPC n=292; AOPC n=2138) with matched whole-transcriptome (NovaSeq) and DNA (NextSeq, 592-gene or NovaSeq, whole-exome) sequencing data were analyzed (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). Limited clinical data precluded stage- and treatment-stratified comparisons. Overall survival (OS) was obtained from insurance claims, and Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for age- and molecularly-defined cohorts. Significance was designated as FDR-corrected P-values (Q) < 0.05.
Results: Of 2430 patients, YOPC patients (median 46 yrs) were more likely to be male (65% vs 52%;P < 0.001) and current smokers (32% vs 11%;P=0.02) compared with AOPC patients (median 75 yrs). YOPC patients had higher proportions of mismatch repair-deficient (2.8% vs 0.8%;P=0.001), BRCA2-mutant (4.7% vs 2.1%;P=0.009), and PALB2-mutant (1.4% vs 0.5%;P=0.04) tumors compared with AOPC patients, while tumors in AOPC patients had more frequent SMAD4 (20.1% vs 14.7%;P=0.03), RNF43 (6.3% vs 2.5%; P=0.012), CDKN2A (24.8% vs 19.2%;P=0.04), and SF3B1 (2.7% vs. 0.7%;P=0.04) mutations. YOPC patients demonstrated lower HLA-DPA1 homozygosity (55% vs 64%;Q < 0.05) vs. AOPC patients. Notably, YOPC patients demonstrated significantly lower incidence of KRAS-mutant (81.3% vs 90.9%;Q < 0.01) tumors compared with AOPC patients. In the KRAS-wildtype subset (n=225), YOPC tumors were more likely to be driven by NRG1 and MET fusions, while BRAF fusions were exclusively observed in AOPC patients. There was an association with improved OS in YOPC patients with KRAS-wildtype (median 22.4 [YOPC-KRASWT] vs 15.1 [AOPC-KRASWT] months; P=0.02) but not KRAS-mutant (P=0.28), tumors compared with AOPC patients.
Conclusions:
YOPC is associated with a distinct molecular landscape compared with AOPC, revealing molecular features with prognostic and therapeutic implications.