HPB
Amer H. Zureikat, MD
Associate Professor of Surgery, Chief Division of Surgical Oncology
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Disclosure: I do not have any relevant financial / non-financial relationships with any proprietary interests.
A single institute PDAC database was surveyed for patients with distal PDAC that underwent surgical resection between 2010 & 2019. The cohort was stratified based on receipt of NAC. Distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection was excluded. Optimal CA19-9 response was defined as normalization and >50% reduction. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves and multivariate-adjusted Cox models were used to evaluate predictors of survival; progression-free and overall survival (OS) were calculated from diagnosis.
Results: One hundred and twenty-seven (n=127) patients were included in this study (NAC: 65, SF: 62). No difference was seen between the two cohorts regarding site of first recurrence (p=0.716), incidence of local progression (p=0.836), or progression free survival (p=0.890). On KM survival estimates examining OS, NAC trended towards association with improvement in survival although did not reach statistical significance (45.1 vs. 25.6, p=0.059). On multivariate-adjusted Cox model, age (HR: 1.02 [1.00, 1.05), p=0.049), lymph node ratio >0.2 (HR: 3.95 [1.93, 8.10), p< 0.001), and presence of perineural invasion (HR: 3.06 [1.08, 8.68), p=0.035) were all associated with worse overall survival, while total duration of therapy (neoadjuvant + adjuvant) 3-6 (HR: 0.43 [0.20, 0.94), p=0.034) and ≥6 months (HR: 0.25 [0.10, 0.65), p=0.004) were protective.
Conclusions: No difference in patterns of recurrence was observed in distal PDAC following resection when comparing NAC vs. SF cohorts. However, total duration of therapy of 3-6 months and ≥6 months were identified as predictors of improved survival.