VP of Biomarker and BioAnalytical Sciences Sangamo Therapeutics Richmond
Clinical development of AAV-based gene therapies typically includes assessment of immunogenicity of both viral capsid and the transgene product. Assay methods like those used for standard biotherapeutics are employed to detect antibodies against capsid and transgene product. However, the observation of adverse effects and loss of response/efficacy in some patients for several gene therapies has triggered consideration of a more complete characterization of the immune response. This characterization may include investigation of measuring early immune responses mediated by innate phase activation (cytokine release by innate immune cells/activated complement measurements). Further delineation of the humoral response may include antibody titer assessment to understand the relevance of post to pre-existing immune response, as well as isotyping and delineation of the time course of the onset of early immune response as it relates to immediate adverse events vs the onset of mature immune response leading to impact on efficacy. In this session we will present case studies illustrating the further characterization of the immune response and how they helped to understand the impact on safety and efficacy to shed light on mechanisms of adverse effects in gene therapy development. The overview from these talks could help support a trigger-based strategy to perform additional characterizations.
The above abstract is for a symposium session proposal which is an outcome from a cross functional collaboration of the Gene and cell therapy product (GCTP) community and Therapeutic Product Immunogenicity (TPI) community. Below is the abstract for one of the talks: Adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based gene therapy has been proven to be a promising platform for treating rare genetic diseases. Pre-existing anti-AAV antibodies may negatively impact efficiency and safety. The two commonly used assay formats for patient selection are transduction inhibition assay to detect neutralizing antibody (NAb) and immunoassay to measure total antibody (TAb) to AAV capsids. For NAb assay, nano-luciferase reporter construct gives improved sensitivity over firefly-luciferase. This presentation will discuss assay sensitivity requirement for clinical efficacy, correlation of the two NAb assays with TAb status and cell line selection.
Learning Objectives:
Different NAb vs TAb assay formats for detecting pre-existing anti-AAV antibodies
Assay sensitivities of firefly- vs nano-luciferase reporters and clinical relevance
How to design a NAb assay for patient enrollment including cell line selection and concordance to TAb assay