Interventional Oncology
Muhammad Saad Malik, MD
Post-doctoral Research Fellow
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center | Harvard Medical School
Disclosure information not submitted.
Nhi H. Vo, MD
Resident
BIDMC
Muhammad Mohid Tahir, MD (he/him/his)
Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Anthony J. Parker, MD PhD
Associated Professor Radiology
BIDMC
Jeffrey Weinstein, MD FSIR
Program Director, Interventional Radiology Residency Programs
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School
Muneeb Ahmed, MD FSIR
Chief, Division of Interventional Radiology
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard
Ammar Sarwar, MD FSIR (he/him/his)
Associate Professor of Radiology
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Determine relationship of tumor absorbed dose with microsphere distribution/mL using PET/CT tumor to normal ratio (T:N) in HCC patients treated with 90Y radiation segmentectomy.
Materials and Methods:
Consecutive HCC patients from 1/2018 to 7/2022 having PET/CT after TARE (108) with resin in <2 segments (56) & 3-month treatment response (48) were retrospectively studied at a single, tertiary hospital. Prescribed activity & prescribed tumor absorbed dose (pTAD) was based on the 99mTc MAA dosimetry (PD). Area segmentation on PET/CT was contoured using MIM SurePlan Liver & dose delivered to 50, 70, & 95% of tumor (D50, D70, D95) was derived from dose volume histograms. Sphere distribution was based on single dose size containing 3.0 GBq.
Β
Spherestotal = (π΄ππ‘ππ£ππ‘π¦π‘ππ‘ππ [πΊπ΅π])/(3βπππ¦ πππβπππ ππππ [πΊπ΅π])Β π₯ 44 πππππππ
Spherestumor = (ππβππππ πππ‘ππ)/(ππππππ‘ ππππ’ππ [ππ])Β π₯ ππ’πππ ππππ’ππ[ππ] π₯ ππΈπβπΆπ π:π
Β
3-month imaging to assess objective response (OR) using mRECIST. Median reported for continuous variables, & unpaired T-test was done on a per tumor per treatment basis.
Results:
A total of 48 tumors (48 treatments) in 44 patients (71 years) were analyzed. 90% had cirrhosis, with MELD of 9 Β± 4, & size of 3.4 cm (1.9-4.7). <90% prescribed activity delivered in 29% (14/48) & β₯90% in 71% (34/38) of tumors. 73% (35/48) had OR. Tumors with OR were smaller on PET/CT (19 vs 76 mL, p< 0.01). Spheres to target & tumor were 7.1 x 106 (20,469 spheres/mL) & 1.3 x 106 (54,889 spheres/mL). No difference seen in tumor spheres/mL between β₯90% vs 90% activity group (54,881 vs 56,737, p=0.54). Tumors with OR had more spheres/mL than those without (61,826 vs 31,445, p=0.22). A significantly positive relationship existed between D50 & tumor spheres/mL (r [46] = .898, p < .001). There was significant difference in tumor sphere/mL between specific ranges for D50: 20-100 Gy (17,578 [13,777-28,596]), 100-200 Gy (31,701 [26,766-39,498]), 200-300 Gy (64,745 [54,550-90,529]), & 300-500 Gy (102,997 [72,815-172,456]), p< 0.001). Tumors with β₯100k spheres/mL (vs < 100k) had higher D50 (475 vs 173 Gy, p< 0.001), D70 (344 vs 120 Gy, p< 0.001), D95 (125 vs 55 Gy, p< 0.001). Tumors β₯50k spheres/mL (vs < 50k) had higher D50 (280 vs 136 Gy, P< 0.001), higher chance of >200 Gy D50 (88% vs 5%, p< 0.001) & higher OR (88% vs 55%, p< 0.05). Tumors β₯45k spheres/mL achieved 200 Gy in 88% of cases, & OR in 88% of treatments.
Conclusion:
A positive relationship existed between D50 & tumor spheres/mL. β₯45k spheres/mL had a higher chance of achieving OR.