Poster Abstracts
Amitabh Gulati, MD
Physician
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York
Adam Laitman, MD
Director of Medical Affairs
Salix Pharmaceuticals
Bridgewater, New Jersey
Patrick Gagnon-Sanschagrin, MSc
Vice President
Analysis Group, Inc.
Montréal, Quebec, Canada
Rebecca Bungay, MSc
Associate
Analysis Group, Inc.
Montréal, Quebec, Canada
Remi Bellefleur, MA
Research Professional
Analysis Group, Inc.
Montréal, Quebec, Canada
Gayatri Marathe, PhD
Associate
Analysis Group, Inc.
Montréal, Quebec, Canada
Annie Guérin, MSc
Managing Principal
Analysis Group, Inc.
Montréal, Quebec, Canada
Brock Bumpass, PharmD
Associate Director, Medical Affairs
Bausch Health
Bridgewater, New Jersey
George Joseph, PhD
Vice President, Health Economics & Value Access – Global Medical Affairs
Bausch Health (formerly); now with BioNTech US Inc.
Bridgewater, New Jersey
Ankur A. Dashputre, PhD
Director, HEOR
Bausch Health
Bridgewater, New Jersey
Olamide Olujohungbe, PharmD
Postdoctoral Fellow
Bausch Health
Bridgewater, New Jersey
Danellys Borroto, PharmD
Postdoctoral Fellow
Bausch Health
Bridgewater, New Jersey
Economic burden of opioid-induced constipation: An analysis of commercially insured patients without cancer in the United States
Background:
Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a significant adverse effect of opioid use, characterized by abdominal tenderness, bloating, and hard stools.1 Among patients receiving opioids for non-cancer pain, OIC may develop in approximately half, and given OIC typically persists for the duration of opioid treatment, it can have considerable negative impacts on daily activity, productivity, and social interaction.1,2 Although prior studies have estimated the healthcare costs associated with OIC among opioid users,3-7 there is limited evidence assessing OIC among continuous opioid users.
Purpose/Objectives:
The current study compared the healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and healthcare costs between continuously treated, commercially insured non-cancer patients with OIC and those without OIC in the United States (US).
Method:
IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus claims (10/2015-12/2021) were used to identify patients (18-64 years) with ≥90 days continuous opioid use. Patients were categorized into OIC or No OIC cohorts, based on presence/absence of an OIC indicator (constipation diagnosis or prescription fill for constipation treatment). The index date was the first OIC indicator within an eligible continuous opioid use episode (OIC cohort) or a randomly selected date (No OIC cohort) to match the time from continuous opioid use episode start to the index date in the OIC cohort. Within the cohorts, patients without cancer (no diagnoses during the 3-month baseline or 6-month study period following the index date) were identified. Cohorts were entropy-balanced. Total healthcare costs during the study period were compared using mean differences; HRU was assessed using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and odds ratios (ORs). For both outcomes, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and p-values were reported.
Results:
Characteristics among the OIC (N=113,012) and No OIC cohorts (N=767,131) were similar post-balancing. Total healthcare costs were significantly higher in the OIC versus No OIC cohort (mean difference [95% CI]=$19,034 [18,425-19,643], p< 0.001), driven by medical costs (mean difference [95% CI]=$16,724 [16,142-17,307], p< 0.001). Pharmacy costs were also significantly higher in the OIC versus No OIC cohort (mean difference [95% CI]=$2,309 [2,163-2,455], p< 0.001). HRU was significantly higher in the OIC than No OIC cohort, with higher odds of outpatient (OR [95% CI]=6.5 [6.1-7.0]) and emergency room visits (OR [95% CI]=1.8 [1.7-1.8]), and incidence of inpatient admissions (IRR [95% CI]=2.2 [2.1-2.2]; all p< 0.001).
Conclusions: This real-world study demonstrates the substantial economic burden associated with OIC among continuous opioid users without cancer. It is important to consider the economic consequences of OIC among patients without cancer who rely on opioids for pain management, as they represent a substantial portion of the population. Further, this study provides insights on a population with particularly long periods of opioid use.
References: 1. Argoff CE. Opioid-induced Constipation: A Review of Health-related Quality of Life, Patient Burden, Practical Clinical Considerations, and the Impact of Peripherally Acting mu-Opioid Receptor Antagonists. Clin J Pain. 2020;36(9):716-722.
2. Farmer AD, Holt CB, Downes TJ, Ruggeri E, Del Vecchio S, De Giorgio R. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of opioid-induced constipation. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3(3):203-212.
3. Candrilli SD, Davis KL, Iyer S. Impact of constipation on opioid use patterns, health care resource utilization, and costs in cancer patients on opioid therapy. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2009;23(3):231-241.
4. Fernandes AW, Kern DM, Datto C, Chen YW, McLeskey C, Tunceli O. Increased Burden of Healthcare Utilization and Cost Associated with Opioid-Related Constipation Among Patients with Noncancer Pain. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2016;9(3):160-170.
5. Fine PG, Chen YW, Wittbrodt E, Datto C. Impact of opioid-induced constipation on healthcare resource utilization and costs for cancer pain patients receiving continuous opioid therapy. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(2):687-696.
6. Olufade T, Kong AM, Princic N, et al. Comparing Healthcare Utilization and Costs Among Medicaid-Insured Patients with Chronic Noncancer Pain with and without Opioid-Induced Constipation: A Retrospective Analysis. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2017;10(2):79-86.
7. Wan Y, Corman S, Gao X, Liu S, Patel H, Mody R. Economic burden of opioid-induced constipation among long-term opioid users with noncancer pain. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2015;8(2):93-102.