East Carolina University School of Dental Medicine
Optimal analysis for applicants to health science programs includes objective analysis of cognitive, non-cognitive, physical, and communication skills. There is an unspoken understanding that different feeder institutions have different academic standards, thus the comparison between applicants for “high-stakes” decisions for admissions have historically included inherent biases. The need is to create a statistically verifiable method for making these important comparisons without such bias. In an endeavor to optimize the traditional cognitive skills, a machine-learning enhanced analytic was created to determine the relative “rigor” of each feeder institution (U.S. Patent No. 11,010,849). This session explores the implications of its implementation.
Learning Objectives:
Evaluate the details of each component of an applicant’s cognitive transcript, coursework and DAT.
Describe the analytics used to modify cognitive transcripts based on differences in feeder institution rigor.
Compare the relative value of cognitive performance to overall applicant potential.