COS 152-3 - CANCELLED - Carbon 5 to 60 years after fire: Planting trees does not compensate for losses in dead wood stores

Background/Question/Methods

While wildfire is a natural disturbance in many forested biomes, the loss of carbon to the atmosphere and mortality of trees actively sequestering carbon is of global concern as a contribution to climate change. Natural regeneration is often successful at re-establishing a forest in ecosystems adapted to fire, but there is increasing concern that the changing size, frequency and severity of wildfire is causing regeneration failures or inadequate restocking of trees that sequester and store carbon following these disturbances. It remains unclear whether the action of planting trees accelerates carbon storage following fire compared to forests established through natural regeneration. The central interior of British Columbia recently experienced multiple years of record-breaking fire activity. Rehabilitation planting focused on re-establishing trees in the managed forest but was also prescribed in previously unmanaged forests to initiate carbon sequestration. Planting is often accompanied by other stand treatments such as salvage harvesting or snag removal and debris clearing. We estimated carbon recovery and stores in 21 wildfires across a chronosequence from the early 1960s to 2015. We measured above and belowground carbon pools to determine the effect of time since fire and planting treatments on carbon.

Results/Conclusions

Tree planting did not increase total ecosystem carbon over time, but rather decreased carbon through the loss of dead wood. All carbon pools were affected by time since fire except the mineral soil pool, which was best predicted by soil clay content and coarse fragments. Live tree carbon increased over time, with more stored in planted stands over 60 years compared to not planted. Projecting growth to 100 years since fire suggests we may see increasing divergence in carbon stores in planted stands over a full fire-return interval, but these differences remain relatively small (mean (sd): 140.8 (19.6) Mg⸱ha^-1 in planted compared to 136.9 (27.5) Mg⸱ha^-1 in unplanted stands), with 1.4 Mg⸱ha^-1 year^-1 sequestered in unplanted compared to 1.5 Mg⸱ha^-1 year^-1 in planted stands. To meet carbon objectives, replanting trees on average sites in burned forests of BC’s central interior would require preserving the carbon legacy of fire, including dead wood.