Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution (ISEM), Université de Montpellier, France
Background/Question/Methods
Population and community ecology traditionally has a very strong theoretical foundation with well-known models, such as the logistic and its many variations, and many modification of the classical Lotka-Volterra predator-prey and interspecific competition models. More and more, these classical models are confronted to data via fitting to empirical time-series from the laboratory, for purposes of projections or for estimating model parameters of interest. However, the interface between mathematical population or community models and data, provided by a statistical model, is far from trivial.
In order to help empiricists make informed decisions, we here ask which error structure one should use when fitting classical deterministic ODE models to empirical microcosm data, from single species to community dynamics and trophic interactions. We use both realistically simulated data and empirical data from microcosms to answer this question in a Bayesian framework.
Results/Conclusions
We find that pure observation error models mostly perform adequately overall. However, state-space models clearly outperform simpler approaches when observation errors are sufficiently large or biological models sufficiently complex.
We show that deterministic models can be sufficient to describe dynamics from stochastic population process that include process variability and observation error. Also, many models do not require a complex state-space model formulation and simpler trajectory matching is sufficient for accurate parameter estimates.
