Infectious Diseases
Purvesh Khatri, PhD
Associate Professor (Research), Medicine
Stanford University
Stanford, California, United States
Michael Freedman, MD MPhil
Clinical Fellow, Postdoctoral Scholar
Lucile Packard Children's Hospital
Daly City, California, United States
Hong Zheng, PhD
Research engineer
Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, United States
Aditya M. Rao, PhD
Graduate Student
Stanford University
Sunnyvale, California, United States
Denis Dermadi, PhD
Research engineer
Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, United States
Lara Murphy Jones, MD
Clinical Scholar
Stanford University School of Medicine
Palo Alto, California, United States
Laurynas Kalesinskas, BS
PhD Candidate
Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, United States
Benjamin D. Solomon, MD, PhD
Pediatric Resident Physician
Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, United States
Background: Host immune response has been repeatedly shown to diagnose the presence and type of infection. Recently, we described a 42-gene blood-based signature, conserved across viruses, that correlates with and predicts the severity of viral infection, irrespective of age, sex, and host or pathogen genetics. This 42-gene signature is composed of 4 modules (2 protective, 2 detrimental). We hypothesize that these modules are also associated with disease severity in patients with bacterial infection.
Methods: We analyzed 58 publicly available datasets of blood transcriptome profiles from 4989 patients (2300 healthy, 1169 with bacterial infection, 1520 with viral infection), and co-normalized them using COCONUT. Severity was stratified into seven categories ranging from healthy to fatal. We evaluated our four module and composite severe-or-mild “SoM” scores, and applied our previously described 7-gene signature (7GS, distinguishing viral from bacterial infection) to both bacterial and viral samples.
Results: Two detrimental module scores were positively correlated with severity of bacterial infections (module 1: r=0.64, module 2: r=0.53), and one of two protective modules was inversely correlated (module 4: r=-0.59). Module 3, protective in viral infections, was minimally positively correlated with severity of bacterial illness (module 3: r=0.20). SoM score distinguished non-severe bacterial infections from severe bacterial infection (r=0.63, AUROC=0.77, 95% CI:0.73-0.80).
Conclusion: SoM score can distinguish patients with severe infection, irrespective of bacterial or viral etiology. When used with our 7GS, it may help decide whether a patient warrants (1) treatment with an antibiotic or (2) discharge or admission upon presentation to an emergency department.