MP32: Surgical Technology & Simulation: Instrumentation & Technology I
MP32-07: Thermal Effects of the Super-Pulse Thulium Fiber Laser During Ureteral Stone Laser Lithotripsy: An In-Vivo Porcine Study
Saturday, May 14, 2022
2:45 PM – 4:00 PM
Location: Room 225
Kalon L. Morgan*, Pengbo Jiang, Akhil Peta, Maged Ayad, Rohit Bhatt, Andrew Brevik, Krista Larson, Zhamshid Okhunov, Ted Farzeneh, Roshan M. Patel, Jaime Landman, Ralph V. Clayman, Orange, CA
Introduction: The super-pulse Thulium Fiber Laser (sTFL) is a promising lithotripsy technology; however, there are concerns regarding potential intraureteral temperature spikes during intraureteral laser lithotripsy. In this study, we evaluated in-vivo porcine ureteral temperature changes during sTFL lithotripsy.
Methods: In a juvenile female Yorkshire pig, bilateral open pyelotomies were used to place a 3-4 mm stone in the proximal, middle, and distal ureter, for a total of 6 stones. Each stone was treated using a 200 µm sTFL at a “dusting” setting of 0.5J, 80Hz (40W) with the irrigation temperature set at 37°C. Ureteral intraluminal and adventitial temperatures were simultaneously measured at each site using two K-Type thermocouples. The laser was activated for a maximum of 5 minutes with intermittent pauses when either thermocouple reached 44°C. Baseline temperature, time to peak temperature (44°C) and time to return to body temperature (37°C) were recorded. The ureteral segments were excised, segmented, and evaluated by a pathologist.
Results: The average continuous lasing time to reach an intraluminal temperature of 44? was 83 seconds (standard deviation (SD) + 45 seconds). The average time to return to baseline of 37? from 44? was 4 seconds (SD + 4 seconds). The average time to reach 44? with each subsequent laser activation was 6 seconds (SD + 5 seconds). The maximum adventitial temperature recorded was 40.3?. Histological examination of distal, middle, and proximal ureters revealed: denuded urothelium with congestion, acute and chronic inflammation of subepithelial connective tissue, muscularis propria with minimal vascular congestion, and an unremarkable serosal layer (Figure 1). These finding were non-specific and no thermal tissue injury was noted.
Conclusions: sTFL in a “dusting” mode results in elevation of intraluminal urothelial temperatures within a minute and a half of continuous laser firing; subsequent laser firing causes a more rapid temperature elevation (6 seconds). The adventitial temperature never reached 44?. Using 5-second bursts of sTFL laser activation followed by a 5 second “rest” period during sTFL ureteral lithotripsy should preclude adverse temperature spikes.