(PO15-14-22) Gender Differences in Diet Quality and Quantity in Rural Bangladesh. Are Men Still Favored?

The ePoster content is available to NUTRITION 2022 LIVE ONLINE attendees who are logged in.<br><br>If you are registered, log in and then come back here to use this button.

Presenting Author(s)

FC

Fiona Coleman, B.S.
– PhD Candidate, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States

Co-Author(s)

AA

Akhter Ahmed, PhD
– International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
SR

Shalini Roy, PhD
– Senior Research Fellow, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
John Hoddinott, PhD
– H.E. Babcock Professor of Food and Nutrition Economics and Policy, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States

Disclosure(s):

Fiona Coleman, B.S.: No relevant financial relationship(s) with ineligible companies to disclose.

Objectives: Studies from Bangladesh have long documented pro-male biases in intrahousehold food allocation. However, many of these earlier studies were conducted against the backdrop of caloric scarcity and since then, food availability and affordability in the country have significantly improved. This study re-examines gender differences in diet quantity and quality in rural Bangladesh with 2012 data.

Methods: The study uses 24-hour dietary recall data collected in 2012 (12,970 individuals within 5,000 households, ages 15+) from ultra-poor rural Bangladeshi households and OLS regressions to test for gender differences in constructed diet measures. Measures include caloric intake, Caloric Adequacy Ratio (CAR: intake divided by estimated requirements based on sex, occupation, and life stage), Dietary Diversity Score (DDS; range 0-10), Global Dietary Quality Score (DGQS; range 0-49), food group intakes (intake per GDQS food group, grams), and ratios of food group intake to total intake. Between-household differences are accounted for by adjusting for demographic and geographic factors.

Results: Preliminary results show that men consume more calories than women (mean kcal: male= 2217.99, female= 2022.25, p < 0.001), but women consume more in reference to their caloric needs (CAR: m = 0.75, f= 0.90, p < 0.001). Men also score higher on diet quality measures (DDS: m=3.43, f=3.32, p < 0.001; GDQS: m=8.27, f=7.69, p < 0.001) and have greater mean intakes in 18 of the 25 GDQS food groups, but the absolute magnitude of male-female differences is small (e.g., < 10 gr. differences in all animal sourced foods). Moreover, compared to women, men did not consume significantly higher proportions of nutrient-dense foods groups.

Conclusions: Results indicate that while men’s intake quantities and diet quality scores are marginally higher, the slight male advantage disappears when energy requirements and food group proportions are accounted for. Accordingly, the study results do not provide evidence of male favoritism in household food allocation.

Funding Sources: National Institutes of Health (award T32DK007158), German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, UK Department for International Development, Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, UN Development Programme, World Food Programme