(PO16-54-22) Nocturnal Lifestyle Behaviour and Sleep Quality During Pregnancy

The ePoster content is available to NUTRITION 2022 LIVE ONLINE attendees who are logged in.<br><br>If you are registered, log in and then come back here to use this button.

Presenting Author(s)

Rachael Si Xuan Loo
– Research Officer, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, New South Wales, Australia

Co-Author(s)

SL

See Ling Loy, -
– Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
CK

Chee Wai Ku
– KK Women's and Children's Hospital
YC

Yin Bun Cheung
– Duke-NUS Medical School
LO

Lay See Ong
– Duke-NUS Medical School
KT

Kok Hian Tan, -
– KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
MC

Mary Foong-Fong Chong, -
– The National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
FY

Fabian Yap
– KK Women's and Children's Hospital
JC

Jerry Kok Yen Chan, -
– Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore

Disclosure(s):

Rachael Si Xuan Loo: No relevant financial relationship(s) with ineligible companies to disclose.

Objectives: Little is known about the extent to which lifestyle practices at night influence sleep quality in pregnant women who are susceptible to sleep disturbances. This study aimed to examine the association between nocturnal lifestyle behaviour and sleep quality of women during pregnancy.

Methods: This observational cross-sectional study recruited pregnant women between 18 and 24 weeks of gestation from KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore. Nocturnal lifestyle behaviour was assessed by frequency of night eating after 8 pm, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity performance after 7 pm, screen viewing >1 hour before bedtime and artificial light exposure with ≥10 lux between 2-4 am. Sleep quality was measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index with global score >5 indicative of poor sleep quality. Modified Poisson regression model tested the association between nocturnal lifestyle behaviour and sleep quality.

Results: Of 299 women, 117 (39.1%) exhibited poor sleep quality. In the covariate-adjusted analysis, an increased risk of poor sleep quality was observed in women with night eating (risk ratio 1.54; 95% confidence interval 1.15, 2.06) and light exposure at night (1.74; 1.34, 2.25). No associations were observed for night-time physical activity (0.84; 0.60, 1.17) and screen viewing before bedtime (1.10; 0.76, 1.60) with sleep quality.

Conclusions: More than one-third of pregnant women experienced poor sleep quality. Night eating and artificial light exposure at night were associated with poor sleep quality during pregnancy. Thus, reducing night eating and decreasing levels of exposure to light at night represent potential targets for healthy sleep interventions in pregnancy, in a bid to augment efforts to promote sleep quality among pregnant women.

Funding Sources: This study is supported by the Singapore Ministry of Health’s National Medical Research Council under its Open Fund-Young Individual Research Grant.