OT04 - Evaluation of a Multiple-mini Interview Format for Small Animal Internal Medicine Residency Programs

Abstract: Background-The multiple-mini interview (MMI) format is utilized by some veterinary schools and multiple human medical training programs to evaluate candidates. The MMI is correlated with candidate success, is more objective, and is perceived as fairer compared to traditional interview formats.

Hypothesis/Objectives-To assess residency candidates’ opinions of an MMI format

Animals-Residency candidates over a 3-year period

Methods- 4 MMI stations were developed based on AAVMC clinical competencies. Candidates were selected for interview based on their VIRMP application. Interviews were performed in person or virtually. Match rank of candidates was based solely on MMI score. Before match day, each interviewee was sent a Qualtrics survey to assess their impressions of the MMI interview experience.

Results- 63 interviewees completed the survey. Most (71%) interviewed via video chat or phone. The MMI was evaluated as fairer by 70% (95% CI, 57%, 81%). 51% (95% CI, 38%, 64%) of interviewees felt the MMI allowed them to demonstrate their strengths. Interviewees found the MMI more stressful (83%, 95% CI 71%, 91%). Overall, 63% (95% CI 50%, 75%) would rank this program more highly based on their experience with the process.

Conclusions and clinical importance-MMIs can feasibly be used for residency interviews in veterinary medicine. Because interviewees perceived the process as fairer and were more likely to rank the program more highly because of the program, residency training programs could consider replacement of a traditional interview with an MMI format. The correlation between MMI performance and resident candidate success needs to be evaluated in specialty veterinary medicine.