Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
Beatriz Samões1, Diogo Fonseca1, Tiago Beirão1, Flavio Costa1, Romana Vieira1, Georgina Terroso2, Raquel Ferreira2, Rafaela teixeira3, André Saraiva4, Maria João Henriques5, Ana Catarina Duarte6, Ana Cristina Cordeiro6, Paulo Vilas-Boas7, Inês Genrinho3, Ana Bento da Silva8, Laura Gago8, Catarina Resende9, Patricia Martins9, Nathalie Madeira10, Sara Paiva Dinis10, Maura Couto3, Inês Santos3, Filipe Araújo11, Ana Filipa Mourão11, Miguel Guerra12, Margarida Oliveira12, Alexandra Daniel13, Marília Rodrigues13, Catarina Soares14, Hugo Parente15, Carolina Furtado16, Tomás Fontes16 and Joana Abelha-Aleixo1, 1Rheumatology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia / Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal, 2Rheumatology department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal, 3Rheumatology department, Centro Hospitalar Tondela-Viseu, Viseu, Portugal, 4Rheumatology department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 5Rheumatology department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Lisboa, Portugal, 6Rheumatology department, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal, 7Rheumatology Department, Centro Hospitalar Baixo Vouga, Aveiro, Portugal, 8Rheumatology department, Hospital de Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, Portugal, 9Rheumatology department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Lisboa Norte, Centro Académico de Medicina de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal, 10Rheumatology department, Unidade Local de Saúde da Guarda - Hospital Sousa Martins, Guarda, Portugal, 11Rheumatology and Osteoporosis Unit, Hospital de Sant´Ana, SCML, Lisboa, Portugal, 12Rheumatology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário da Cova da Beira, Covilhã, Portugal, 13Rheumatology department, Hospital Distrital de Leiria, Leiria, Portugal, 14Rheumatology department, Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho, Ponte de Lima, Viana do Castelo, Portugal, 15Rheumatology department, Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho, Ponte de Lima, Portugal, 16Rheumatology department, Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo, Ponta Delgada, Portugal
Background/Purpose: Calcinosis is a challenging problem among Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) patients with a reported prevalence of 18-49%. We aim to define the prevalence of clinical and subclinical calcinosis among Portuguese SSc patients, currently unknown, as well as the most sensitive anatomical location and the sensitivity of the clinical method for its diagnosis. We also aim to clarify the phenotype of SSc patients with calcinosis.
Methods: A cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted evaluating SSc patients from 14 Portuguese centers, registered in the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Registry (Reuma.pt), that fulfilled Leroy/Medsger 2001 or ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SSc. The assessment of calcinosis was made systematically through clinical examination and plain radiographs of hands, elbows, knees and feet, analyzed by 2 rheumatologists of each center. Statistical analysis with independent parametric or non-parametric tests, multivariate logistic regression of the significant variables in univariate analysis and sensitivity calculation of each radiographed site and of the clinical method for the diagnosis of calcinosis were performed.
Results: 226 patients were included, of whom 191 were female (84.5%), with a median [min, max] age of 64 [20, 90] years-old and a median [min, max] disease duration of 11.47 [1, 62] years. 172 patients (76.4%) had limited SSc, 36 (16%) diffuse SSc, 9 (4%) sine scleroderma SSc and 8 (3.6%) early SSc. Clinical calcinosis was described in 63 (28.1%) patients, 10 of which was not radiologically confirmed. 91 (40.3%) patients had radiological calcinosis in at least one site [hand in 68 (74.7%), knee in 32 (35.2%), elbow in 30 (34.1%) and foot in 21 (23.9%)], of which 37 (40.7%) were subclinical. The most sensitive location to detect calcinosis was the hand (74.7%) while the sensitivity of the clinical method was 58.2%. Table 1 summarizes the clinical characteristics of patients with and without calcinosis. Patients with calcinosis were more often female (p=0.008), older (p < 0.001) and with longer disease duration (p < 0.001). The presence of calcinosis was significantly associated with limited SSc (p=0.017), telangiectasia (p=0.039), digital ulcers (p=0.001), oesophageal (p < 0.001) and intestinal (p=0.003) involvements. Osteoporosis and late scleroderma capillaroscopic pattern (p < 0.001) were significantly more often on calcinosis group (p=0.028). In multivariate analysis, digital ulcers (OR 2.631, 95%CI 1.022-6.775, p=0.045) were found to be predictors of overall calcinosis, oesophageal involvement (OR 3.521, 95%CI 1.282-9.668, p=0.015) and osteoporosis (OR 4.083, 95%CI 1.176-14.176, p=0.027) of hand calcinosis and late capillaroscopic pattern (OR 7.608, 95%CI 1.661-34.858, p=0.009) of knee calcinosis.
Conclusion: The prevalence of overall calcinosis was in the range of that previously reported. The higher prevalence of subclinical calcinosis suggests that calcinosis might be underdiagnosed and that radiographic screening in SSc patients might be relevant. The differences between patients with and without calcinosis are in agreement with the literature. Calcinosis predictors appear to vary according to location and suggest a multifactorial pathogenesis. Table 1 - Demographic and clinical features of SSc patients with and without calcinosis. Disclosures: B. Samões, None; D. Fonseca, None; T. Beirão, None; F. Costa, None; R. Vieira, None; G. Terroso, None; R. Ferreira, None; R. teixeira, None; A. Saraiva, None; M. Henriques, None; A. Duarte, None; A. Cordeiro, None; P. Vilas-Boas, None; I. Genrinho, None; A. Bento da Silva, None; L. Gago, None; C. Resende, None; P. Martins, None; N. Madeira, None; S. Paiva Dinis, None; M. Couto, None; I. Santos, None; F. Araújo, None; A. Mourão, None; M. Guerra, None; M. Oliveira, None; A. Daniel, None; M. Rodrigues, None; C. Soares, None; H. Parente, None; C. Furtado, None; T. Fontes, None; J. Abelha-Aleixo, None.