Poster Session A - Sunday Afternoon
Category: IBD
Bruce E. Sands, MD, MS, FACG
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, NY
Table 1. Symptomatic remissiona rates during the LTE in randomized patients | |||
Analysis | 90 mg UST SC q12wb | 90 mg UST SC q8wb | Overall UST |
Symptomatic remission in the ITT populationc,d,e (treatment failure and missing data nonresponder imputation) | |||
Week 44, n/N (%) | 107/172 (62.2) | 119/176 (67.6) | 226/348 (64.9) |
Week 200, n/N (%) | 96/172 (55.8) | 96/176 (54.5) | 192/348 (55.2) |
Symptomatic remission in biologic naïvef patients | |||
Week 44, n/N (%) | 68/95 (71.6) | 57/79 (72.2) | 125/174 (71.8) |
Week 200, n/N (%) | 62/95 (65.3) | 55/79 (69.6) | 117/174 (67.2) |
Symptomatic remission in biologic failuref patients | |||
Week 44, n/N (%) | 34/70 (48.6) | 57/91 (62.6) | 91/161 (56.5) |
Week 200, n/N (%) | 30/70 (42.9) | 37/91 (40.7) | 67/161 (41.6) |
Corticosteroid-free symptomatic remission in the ITT populationc,d,e,g | |||
Week 44, n/N (%) | 105/172 (61.0) | 116/176 (65.9) | 221/348 (63.5) |
Week 200, n/N (%) | 94/172 (54.7) | 91/176 (51.7) | 185/348 (53.2) |
Symptomatic remission in patients treated in the LTE (treatment failure and missing data nonresponder imputation)d,e | |||
Week 44, n/N (%) | 117/141 (83.0) | 119/143 (83.2) | 236/284 (83.1) |
Week 200, n/N (%) | 96/141 (68.1) | 96/143 (67.1) | 192/284 (67.6) |
Symptomatic remission up to the time of dose adjustment with treatment failure rules applied in patients treated in the LTEd (modified as observedh) | |||
Week 44, n/N (%) | 117/141 (83.0) | 119/143 (83.2) | 236/284 (83.1) |
Week 200, n/N (%) | 58/65 (89.2) | 73/89 (82.0) | 131/154 (85.1) |
AE, adverse event; ITT, intent-to-treat; LTE, long-term extension; q8w, every 8 weeks; q12w, every 12 weeks; SC, subcutaneous; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; UC, ulcerative colitis; UST, ustekinumab a Symptomatic remission is defined as a stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. b Randomized group at maintenance Week 0 regardless of whether or not patients had a dose adjustment during the long-term extension. c Patients who had a prohibited change in UC medication, an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 visit were considered not to be in symptomatic remission at Week 44. d Patients who had an ostomy or colectomy, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC after Week 44 and prior to Week 200, were considered not to be in symptomatic remission at Week 200. e Patients who had both stool frequency and rectal bleeding subscores missing at a visit were considered not to be in symptomatic remission for that visit. f Efficacy was evaluated only in patients with a history of biologic failure to ≥1 biologic (anti-TNFα or integrin antagonist) and those who were biologic naïve; 7 UST q12w and 6 UST q8w patients who were biologic-experienced but did not have documentation of a history of biologic failure are excluded. g Patients who had a missing value in corticosteroid use had their last value carried forward. h The observed data excluded patients with missing data and had not had treatment failure (i.e., an ostomy or colectomy, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC) prior to the designated visit. |