C0445 - Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) by Macroscopic On-Site Evaluation (MOSE): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City, UT
Babu P. Mohan, MD, MS1, Deepak Madhu, MD, MRCP, DM2, Nitin Reddy, MBBS3, Beatriz Sordi-Chara, MD4, Shahab Khan, MBBS5, Gauri Garg, BS6, Lena Kassab, MD7, Arunkumar Muthusamy, MD8, Achintya Singh, MD9, Saurabh Chandan, MD10, Antonio Facciorusso, MD, PhD11, Benedetto Mangiavillano, MD12, Alessandro Repici, MD13, Douglas G. Adler, MD, FACG14 1University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; 2Caritas Hospital, Kottayam, Kerala, India; 3PSG Institute of Medical Science, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India; 4University of Joinville, Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil; 5Brigham's & Children Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA; 6University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; 7Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; 8Cedar Valley Medical Specialists, Waterloo, IA; 9Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; 10CHI Health Creighton School of Medicine, Omaha, NE; 11University of Foggia, Foggia, Puglia, Italy; 12Humanitas Mater Domini, University of Castellanza, Castellanza, Valle d'Aosta, Italy; 13Humanitas Clinical & Research Center, Rozzano, Molise, Italy; 14Centura Health-Porter Adventist Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT
Introduction: Assessment of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine needle tissue adequacy by macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) is gathering attention. Studies report good diagnostic parameters with MOSE; however, the overall data is limited and it is unknown if MOSE is as good as rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE). We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to report on the pooled diagnostic parameters of EUS-guided tissue acquisition by MOSE using fine needle biopsy (FNB).
Methods: Major databases like Medline, Embase, Scopus were searched by experienced medical librarian (Dec 2021), and studies that reported on the diagnostic assessment of EUS-guided tissue acquisition by MOSE were selected. Pooled diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated by standard meta-analysis methods following the random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2% statistics.
Results: 14 studies were included in the final analysis. 1508 lesions were biopsied in 1489 patients undergoing EUS-guided tissue acquisition. MOSE definition included a visible core of tissue with opacity, ‘worm-like’ features of adequate size and length (>4mm). Majority of the lesions biopsied were solid pancreatic masses (692 lesions, 45.8%), followed by lymph nodes (n=334, 22.1%), submucosal tumors (n=183, 12.1%), and other extra-pancreatic lesions (n=299, 19.8%). The pooled accuracy of biopsy specimen in yielding a pathological diagnosis by MOSE was 91.3% (95% CI 88.6-93.3, I2=66%), pooled sensitivity was 91.5% (88.6-93.6, I2=66%), pooled specificity was 98.9% (96.6-99.7, I2=80%), pooled PPV was 98.8% (97.4-99.5, I2=33%), and pooled NPV was 55.5% (46.9-63.9, I2=95%). The pooled rate of good specimen quality by MOSE as assessed by the endoscopist was 84.9% (60.1-95.4, I2=91%). The pooled rate of diagnostic yield was 93% (87.7-96.1, I2=73%). Adverse events were minimal (2.5%, 1.5-3.9, I2=21%). Subgroup analysis by needle type is summarized in Table-1.
Discussion: Based on a meta-analysis of 14 studies, EUS-guided tissue acquisition with MOSE demonstrated excellent pooled diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and PPV. Criteria of MOSE must include a visible core of tissue with opacity, ‘worm-like’ features of adequate size and length (>4mm). In centers with access to ROSE, future well-controlled studies are warranted to establish the outcomes of MOSE in comparison to ROSE, especially with the newer generation EUS specific biopsy needles.
Figure: Table-1. Other needles: (ProCore, Boston Expect, Echotip Ultra), PPV: positive predictive value, NPV: negative predictive value, NA: not applicable
Disclosures:
Babu Mohan indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Deepak Madhu indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Nitin Reddy indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Beatriz Sordi-Chara indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Shahab Khan indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Gauri Garg indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Lena Kassab indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Arunkumar Muthusamy indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Achintya Singh indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Saurabh Chandan indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Antonio Facciorusso indicated no relevant financial relationships.