Health Psychology / Behavioral Medicine - Adult
Impacts of Disordered Eating Patterns on Health Behaviors and Functioning: Results from a Weight-Diverse Community Sample
Brooke Palmer, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Rachel D. Barnes, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
University of Minnesota Medical School
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Jessica L. Lawson, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Yale University School of Medicine
Darien, Connecticut
Sheila Hanson, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
University of North Dakota
Grand Forks, North Dakota
Introduction:
Patterns of maladaptive eating behaviors such as loss of control over eating (LOC-E) and food addiction (FA) are fixtures in disordered eating literature and associated with health factors such as poor sleep and impaired functioning. LOC-E and FA do occur in non-clinical samples and it is feasible they may have similar detrimental effects. The current study sought to investigate the relationship between LOC-E and FA in a non-clinical, weight-diverse population on outcomes including sleep and weight-related disability. With IRB approval, participants (N=631) recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk provided written informed consent, and completed the following surveys: Eating Loss of Control Scale (ELOCS), modified Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 (mYFAS), Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2), Sheehan Disability Scale-Weight (SDS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and several validity-check questions. Self-reported height and weight were used to calculate BMI (M=27.31,SD=6.94). Participants were on average 37.55 years old (SD=12.25), and primarily female (65.40%) and White, not Hispanic (72.70%). For participants with healthy weight (n=248), overweight (n=198), and obesity (n=185), the YFAS was significantly related to all SDS outcomes (p< .001 for all), most of the 7 PSQI-subscales (p< .001 to p=.032), and PSQI-global (p< .001). The ELOCS was significantly related to SDS outcomes (p< .001 to p=.027), most of the 7 PSQI-subscales (p< .001 to p=.049), and PSQI-global (p< .001). Two hierarchical regression analyses assessed the impact of the YFAS and ELOCS on the SDS and PSQI. Demographics (sex, age, race), BMI, and the PHQ-2 were entered first, followed by the YFAS and ELOCS. The two models were significant when predicting the PSQI (p< .001) and SDS-total (p< .001), with the YFAS (p=.002, p< .001) and ELOCS (p< .001, p< .001) both accounting for unique significant variance in the PSQI and SDS-total, respectively, after accounting for demographics, BMI, and the PHQ-2. Conclusions: Although LOC-E and FA are often found in clinical populations, this novel study investigated these concerns across healthy weight, overweight, and obese nonclinical participants. Importantly, our study results showed LOC-E and FA were related to poorer sleep and functioning across domains of work/school, social, and family/home, even among healthy weight adults. Of note, while these data were collected prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, they are likely even more relevant now given the negative impact the pandemic has had on sleep and eating behaviors. These initial findings suggest potentially widespread deleterious impacts of LOC-E and FA in a non-clinical population and may inform future intervention and prevention efforts.
Methods:
Results: