Tinnitus and Hyperacusis (TH)
Thea A. Holder, BS
Student
The State University of New York at Buffalo
Buffalo, New York, United States
Ieda Ishida, PhD
Research Audiologist
Sonova Canada, United States
Adam Sheppard, Center for Hearing and Deafness
Assistant Professor
University at Buffalo
Buffalo, New York, United States
Wei Sun, PhD
Associate Professor
University at Buffalo
Buffalo, New York, United States
Jinyu Qian
VP, Innovation Centre Toronto
Sonova Canada, United States
Christina T. Stocking, AuD
Clinical Professor
University at Buffalo
Amherst, New York, United States
When asked about methods of tinnitus assessment, audiologists reported using 0.25-8 kHz pure tone audiometry (100%), standardized questionnaires (68%), immittance testing (67%), tinnitus pitch and loudness matching, and OAEs (55%). Fewer audiologists (< 45%) utilized minimum masking levels, loudness discomfort levels, and extended high-frequency audiometry. There is a discrepancy amongst AAO-HNSF, AAA, and ASHA, where AAO-HNSF does not recommend the use of tinnitus pitch and loudness matching. ASHA does not recommend loudness discomfort levels. OAEs and extended high-frequency testing have gained support from peer-reviewed literature but are not recommended by professional organizations.
When asked what their treatment plan consists of, at least 79% of audiologists reported using the following tools (ordered from most to least commonly used): information counseling, fitting hearing aids, management counseling, and sound therapy. While CPGs strongly recommend the use of counseling, sound therapy is listed as an optional management tool. Both AAA and ASHA recommend sound therapy for tinnitus management.