Effects of small-scale habitat restoration on genetic diversity and connectivity in bee populations
Thursday, August 5, 2021
Link To Share This Poster: https://cdmcd.co/Rrm9PQ Live Discussion Link: https://cdmcd.co/v9DZm5
Hannah Hayes, University of San Francisco, Claire Kremen, Institute of Resources, Environment and Sustainability, Dept. of Zoology and Biodiversity Research Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Shalene Jha, Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX and Sevan Suni, Biology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Presenting Author(s)
Hannah Hayes
University of San Francisco
Background/Question/Methods Pollination is essential for the health of natural ecosystems and agricultural productivity, with over 75% of crops benefitting from animal pollination. Bee populations are in decline due to a suite of anthropogenic changes including habitat destruction. Habitat destruction is particularly harmful when it results in highly fragmented areas of remaining natural habitat, because it limits dispersal among populations, which is critical for the maintenance of genetic diversity. Past habitat loss can reduce viability of small isolated populations due to inbreeding depression and random fixation of deleterious alleles. In an attempt to promote biodiversity, there have been efforts to restore degraded habitats to a more natural state. We investigated the genetic responses of a wild bee species following small-scale habitat restoration in an intensively managed agricultural area. We assessed the genetic diversity and genetic connectivity of populations of the sweat bee Halictus ligatus in hedgerows of floral enhancements along the margins of large crop fields in Yolo County, CA. To measure genetic diversity and connectivity, we performed double-digest restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (ddRADseq). Results/Conclusions We found high levels of genetic polymorphism in the agricultural area after conservation intervention. We discuss how genetic diversity varied over time and with landscape factors. Our results provide insight into the ecological and genetic return on investment of habitat restoration activities in agricultural landscapes.