103 Views
Tuesday Poster Session
Category: Colon
Faisal Ali, MD
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, TX, United States
Table 2. Comparative Meta-Analysis of Outcomes of SEMS Insertion for The Treatment of Proximal versus Distal Malignant Colon Obstruction | |
Variable | OR (95% CI; I2) |
Technical Success | 0.43 (0.20-0.90; I2 0%) |
Clinical Success | 0.89 (0.43-1.86; I2 32.69%) |
Adverse Events | 0.76 (0.45-1.29) |
SEMS Migration | 0.84 (0.26-2.69; I2 0%) |
SEMS Impaction | 0.77 (0.15-3.93; I2 0%) |
Tumor Ingrowth | 2.07 (0.09-50.04; I2 74.14%) |
Tumor Overgrowth | 0.86 (0.03-22.16; I2 NA; 1 Study) |
Luminal Perforation | 1.55 (0.40-5.96; I2 0%) |
Endoscopic Reintervention due to Adverse Events | 2.64 (0.05-138.39; ; I2 NA; 1 Study) |
Surgical Intervention due to Adverse Events | 0.55 (0.11-2.77; I2 NA; 1 Study) |